Friday, December 28, 2012

We kill and make fun of our topnotch scientists, don't we?


I am just one of the hard-working taxpayers in the Philippines and I am disappointed that our national departments can make light of giving a post humus award to the late respected biologist, Leonard Co.


Leonard Co expertise was in plant taxonomy and we are amazed at the many NEW flora species the biologist has uncovered mainly in the remaining forests of the Philippines.


A new rafflesia discovered in Northern Luzun was named in his honor.

Today, December 29, 2012 happens to be Dr. Leonardo Co's birthday!He would have been 58 years old today.


Dr. Co was reportedly killed on the Monday of November 8, 2010 in a crossfire between Army elements and NPA rebels while collecting plant specimens in an Leyte forest.


Further reading explorations:
[1] wikipilipinas

[2] Facebook pages: PNPSCI,Memoriam page for Leonardo Co

[3] Inquirer.net. Top botanist killed in crossfire

Links to images posted in the public interest.

Never accept a culture of violence against women and children!

Our hearts go out to the victim of a very violent gang rape in India. The latest news was that the 23 years old young woman died in a Singaporean hospital. The girl was assaulted in a bus and thrown out by the sidewalk by more than five drunk young men.

India is actually advanced economically and technologically. But the national outrage over the sensational crime, with Indian government policemen against protesters should now bring focus to this aspect of Indian culture of degrading treatment of women.

Women's rights and safety is a universal concern! Let us learn from this sad event.

For more details, see reports of her death[1] and more gruesome details in [2].
Being a woman or a girl in India carries with it a heavy yoke! See [3].


[1] Retuers: India gang-rape victim dies in Singapore hospital

[2]Foxnews, january 4, 2013

[3] Why dont you kill her?

You'd think tap water is dirtier than bottled water?



The water distribution systems in Manila are serviced by the regulated utility companies Maynilad and Manila Water.
The Metro Manila Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Committee(MMDWQMC) in public ads has declared that based on analysis
of water samples at various regulatory sampling points in the respective areas of said water distribution companies.

Based on the results from 541 samples from Manila Water East Zone and 823 samples from West Zone (Maynilad), the following
results show the state of drinking tap water

  • 100 % free from disease causing coliforms
  • 100 % compliance with physical and chemical standards based on examination

Both water utility firms surpassed the minimum sampling frequency requirement of the 2007 PNSDW (Philippine National Standards for Drinking Water?) for both microbiological and physico-chemical quality. In comparison, the MMDWQCMC divulged that out of 1053 water refilling stations monitored in Metro Manila for the month of November 2012, only 1036 passed the potability standards set by PNSDW. The above information was gleaned from page 15 of yesterday's December 28 issue of Philstar newspaper.

We would like to suggest that water quality should be INDEPENDENTLY and RANDOMLY confirmed by chemical analytical laboratories of schools or specialized water analysis firms, not only from designated sampling points but from the taps of randomly selected households and commercial food establishments.

Metro Manila residents should breath a sigh of relief that they should not be addicted to buying bottle water for that unfounded "psychological" edge that it is clean and potable.

Help save the environment, tap water is more than clean enough, more than safe enough! We hope it will stay that way, for many years to come. Let us not overfill the planet with plastic bottles.



Thursday, December 13, 2012

Philippine Lower House approves RH BILL, the ball is in the SENATE now!


It is good that the lower house or the house of representatives by majority vote approve the House version of the Reproductive Health Bill. But the timing cannot be propitious when this bill comes up to the Senate. Remember this is Christmas Season and the Senate might go in recess into the immediate near future. This is a sad history of the RH bill which has been in gestation for more than ten years!


You can see the names of the 113 congressmen who voted yes or 104 who voted no and three who abstained. It is reported that three congressmen from Cebu were absent during the voting.See Sunstar.com 12/12/2012 issue.




It is a little amusing how the NO votes justified their stand. This graphic by John Dy, shared in fAcebook shows it all(copy and paste on the url bar to view):

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/546815_436523376412918_124873460_n.jpg












Monday, December 10, 2012

Why Pacquiao lost.


All of the following reasons are just plain hypothetical reasons. We have no proofs to back up most of them.


1. Dirty foot trick of Marquez. Did he or did he not intentionally step on Pacquiao's foot five times to make his foe off-balance? Please watch the video below.


2. Conversion of Pacquiao from a Roman Catholic to a born-again Christian. Even his mother claims that this is the best reason why his son lost!

3. Marquez bulking up using performance enhancement drugs - incredible muscle buildup in one year with the assistance of a tainted conditioning coach.


To be updated.... until this message is removed.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

USA: Sign of the Times: Freedom of Religion has gone awry.


What does this portend for America? On the other hand, I dont mind if they banned religious graven images (it is part of the Ten commandments!!) but Obama portrayed as a Roman ruler? ..., that smacks of something else, or is someone fawning to get into the graces of Obama?





Friday, November 23, 2012

We fear the Philippines has no bright future, her bright, young professionals are killed



We ask the presidency of our beloved president Pnoy to think of the people who loved their country to the point of death! Here is one bright light who life was snuffed out by professional assasins for exposing the fertilizer scam during the term of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.



She is Marlene Garcia, a BS Chemistry graduate of a university based in Iloilo and who later shifted to hard hitting and biting journalism field. Rest in peace, Ms. Marlene.You will not be forgotten!



Acknowledgement: Photo uploaded by her classmate to Facebook from Batch 1980 of University of St. Agustin school yearbook.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Noynoy gets his wish in appointing Marvic Leonen as SC justice



After masterminding the successful procsecution of the former Chief Justice Renato Corona, President Noy is lucky to appoint not one but two of his personal choices to the Supreme Court! The new chief Justice is Ma. Lourdes Sereno, who does NOT crave the limelight, she is averse to media scrutiny.

Now Noy has the enviable choice of appointing today, November 21, relatively young at 49 years, chief government negotiator Marvic Leonen as Supreme Court (SC) associate justice, in place of the position vacated by Supreme Court Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno.

Leonen will forever be tainted as Aquino's YES man in the Supreme Court, though that remains to be seen. Now Aquino may quietly stop the SC in putting a final decision about the distribution of the vast sprawling Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac.

And yet we are aware that Pres. Noy Aquino promised to have a single term, that only means in 3 years he will step down. But history has always been farcical towards pronouncements on retirement on political ambitions. Perhaps Noy will get infected with hunger for power when his term is nearly up. But we are willing to wait and will continue to monitor this sad development, the SC DOES NOT look independent to the public! Now we have two appointees who may think of Utang na Loob when they decide cases involving the actions of President Noy and the interests of the Aquino-Cojuangco family.

We offer our congratulations to the Honorable Marvic Leonen, but we also send him a message that us political bloggers will be alert to follow his decisions on cases under consideration of the Supreme Court.





Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Should not Pres. Noy be more discreet in his personal choice for SC justice?


This does not look presidential at all. President Noy should have kept his mouth shut about his presonal choice for filling in the vacancy in the Supreme Court due to the elebation of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.

It besmirches the reputation of the Supreme Court as a whole since the open endorsement of President Noy for Marvic Leonen gives the idea that there is one justice who owes his appointment personally to President Noy! Although it remains to be seen, his candidate will be judge preliminary as the President's man in the supreme court!

Pres. Noy! Will you please keep your mouth shut and let the JBC do its work ?!!


Further reading:

philstar.com, 11/12/2012: Noy wants Leonen for SC


Saturday, November 3, 2012

Negros Occidental Governor pushes for Coal fired power plant in Cadiz City


The governor of Negros Occidental, the Honorable Alfredo Marañon Jr. has given advise to the local officials of Cadiz City to go on with the proposed coal-fired power plant to be sited in the City.

Yet, this is the same power plant proposed in Pulupandan and Bago but which did not push through due to the organized opposition of environmentalists some of whom are residents of the area and have experience living besides a coal fired power plant of the Asian Alcohol Corporation when it was still operational.


The governor claims that power plants in Iloilo and Cebu have environmental controls explaining why people in those places have not voiced any complaint regarding health and pollution issues. He further added that oppositors to the project were talking without any facts or basis. See [Ref 3].

Yet it has been observed that the number of dolphins have decreased in the Tañon strait near the coal fired plant in Toledo, Cebu. [Ref. 2]

The governor emphasized the importance of stable power.

It is to be noted that the project for the coal fired power plant has been approved by Pres. Benigno Aquino III and Vice president Jejomar Binay.
Target date for completion is year 2014!

No one can argue against the fact that burning coal is the dirtiest, most carbon intensive of all fossil fuels one of the leading contributors to climate change.

References:

  1. Sunstar, 10/31/2012: Governor bats for coal fired power plant
  2. Sunstar, 9/2/2012; Groups oppose to build more power plants in Cebu
  3. Inquirer.net, 10/22/2010: Probe sought on Iloilo coal fired power plant

Sunday, October 21, 2012

When will the Philippine allow divorce?


Till death do as part, two people in love promise each other during their marriage. Yet time may find one or both parties unhappy with each other, or one of the parties may descend into alcoholism, workholicism, gambling, spousal abuse, kids abuse and other signs of unhappy marriage.

The Philippines has the singular[1] distinction of being the only country left of honor of not allowing divorce although its Muslim citizens are allowed divorce!. It is surprising that France, Italy, Spain and Ireland, predominantly Catholic countries do allow divorce. What prevents the Philippines from having a law to allow divorce? Why, in the Philippines, rich husbands have mistressees! and wives are known to have paramours or lovers.

Married couples do have the remedy of annulment if their marriage is falling apart, i.e., they fell out of love, but it would be much better if divorce is allowed.

There is no reason to continue without a divorce bill, let us give couples with failing marriages an escape clause to start their lives all over again. It is not only the poor citizens but even Senators![3].

Reference 2 gives a good overview on divorce.


References:

[1] The Vatican is considered a sovereign city-state inside Italy!

[2] Wikipedia article on divoce.

[3] Philipine senators with marriage on the rocks.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Time to do away with the partylist system!


At this point in time, we can say that not only is the party list system proven unnecessary, but is an added public expense with non-zero accounting. Some of the sitting representatives of partylists are confirmed millionaires and do not even belong to the party list they represent like security guards. Worse, there are cases of OVER REPRESENTATION like the Ako Bicol case. From our reference 1(Inquirer):


The Comelec pointed out Ako Bicol’s expressed objective was to uplift and represent Bicolanos, who already are well represented in Congress.

“If this commission were to allow Ako Bicol’s continued participation in the party-list system, this commission is condoning the continued and blatant violation of the proportional representation of ‘provinces, cities and Metropolitan Manila in accordance with the number of their inhabitants, and on the basis of a uniform ad progressive ratio,’” the Comelec said.


Let us stop making Congress a monster. The party list system, which was enacted in 1995 under RA 7941 must go!

Further reading:

  1. Inquirer.net: Ako Bicol, 12 other part list groups axed

Monday, October 8, 2012

Supreme Court regains our trust!?

We are glad that Pres. Noy's chosen one for the Supreme Court has proven that the SC is an indpendent body that is NOT beholden to anyone.Just now, the Supreme Court has issued a TRO (temporary restraining order) for the implementation of the Cybercrime Prevention Law after accepting 15 petitions for its decision on the constitutionality of the law after the law was passed by the Senate/Congress and put into law by President Nonoy Aquino last September 12, 2012.

Noy should not get mad over this virtual slap on his palms, nor think of retaliation against the SC. By the constitution, the SC is the mandated LONE supreme power to determine the constitutionality of any acts, ordinances or laws. Noy should be happy that he was not allowed to sink deeper into the quagmire of foolishness or an accomplice party to some sleight of hand int the Senate proceedings, especially the surreptitious entry of Libel provisions in the RA 10175.

The ambiguous and dangerous law must now be resubmitted to both Congress and Senate.
and hopefully any provisions which infringe on the inalienable rights and civil liberties, or are not in consonance with constitution or current International legal oblications must not even see the light of day!

We hope that the SC will be consistent in its decisions, and not wait too long for anger of the people to boil over!

Further reading: Philstar.com:SC issues a TRO on new Cyberlaw!





UST Varsitariian does not speak for ALL UST students regarding RH bill



Please refer to the current editorial in Varsitarian,net: RH bill, Ateneo, and La Salle: Of lemons and cowards., which purports to display the official stand of the UST student and administration of UST regarding the Reproductive Health Act.

Who says religious fanaticism can be found in Muslim counties only? The Varsitarian, the official organ of the student body or the University of the Philippines, has lambasted professors of Lasalle and Ateneo for not kowtowing or blindly follwing the official stand of the Catholic bishops on the RH bill.

We are simply amazed and shocked at the stand of UST's official paper. We suspect that the editorial piece was written not by a student but by someone from the administration of UST. Regardsless who the suthor is, the piece smacks of mindless devotion and intolerance.


We call on the Varsitarian to offer a public apology.


Our leaders love to play blind on the constitutionality of the RA 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act!


Now we have two leaders who are playing blind to the fact that some provisions are obviously unconstitutional. The first one is incredibly, will you please stop laughing, is Justice Secretary Leila de Lima!

She claims that any legal questions can be addressed in the IRR or the implementent rules and regulation to be crafted with stakeholders (dont you just love to use the word "stakeholders?") We are glad she was not chosen as the Supreme Court Chief Justice.

The next leader is Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, who blamed Senator Santiago for failing to look into the constitutionality of the Cybercrime Prevention Act when the bill was still being deliberated in Congress early this year. Of course he failed to mention that the worrisome provisions about libel were SNEAKED in, or inserted by his good ally Senator Vicente Sotto. He added that he was ABSENT at the time the RA 10175 was passed by the Senate. He passed the buck to his fellow senators who failed to QUESTION or check the constitutionality of the cybercrime law during the discussion stage. Enrile now cries out about the inhouse expert, Sen. Miriam Santiago, on the Constitution:


“She could have seen it. She was the expert in constitutional law, I am not saying that I am expert on that but the point is, she could have raised that question when it was being crafted into a law,



He also added the lame excuse "NO LAW IS PERFECT!", and there is NOTHING WRONG if any law is declared unconstitutional. A law is not a perfect document, it is done by human beings! Thus we are heartened that Enrile is not claiming to be a God! when it comes to crafting laws as their mandated job require.

Bayan Muna Rep. Teddy Casiño made the following cogent remarks on the Cybercrime Law:

It is to be remembered for posterity that the House bill APPROVED by the HOUSE, did not contain the questionable provisions found in the Senate version and the passed law. The House version did not contain the ‘electronic libel’ provision found in Section 4 (c) 4... There was no mention at all of the DOJ’s (Department of Justice) ‘blocking access’ power found in Section 19 of the law,” Teddy Casino added.

“Section 4 (b) 4 (cc) of the House bill did not contain the phrase ‘provided that the penalty to be imposed shall be one degree higher than that provided by the Revised Penal Code, and Special Laws.’ “While Section 9 of the House version allowed ‘real time collection of computer data,’ it requires the need to ‘secure a court warrant.’ The Senate version, found in Section 12 of the law, deleted this very important warrant requirement”

Meanwhile the bounds of credulity has been bent so much by the news item[See 2nd reference] that the President may be impeached due to the cybercrime law! We just laugh at this item, and we only surmise that this is only for PUBLICITY purposes!

Further reading:
  1. Cybercrime law constitutional - Enrile, De Lima

  2. Kabataan partylist: Aquino may be impeached for cybercrime law

  3. Rappler.com: Colmenares asks SC to nullify Cybercrime Law

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Unwanted influence in the Padaca case: Did Noy forget he is president of the Philippines?


I am still a fan of Grace Padaca, and I believed she won fair and square in the past elections for congressman.

Still I am flummoxed by Noy Aquino's gesture of paying the P70,000 bail on graft charges against Padaca who was recently installed as a Comelec commisioner. Noy Aquino is not just an ordinary citizen, he is the president of the Philippines. He should have let the courts decide on the merits of the case against Grace. Ah, did the successful impeachment drive against former Chief Justice Corona gone to the Predident's head?

The charges against Grace Padaca stemmed from an alleged granting of a P25-million hybrid rice project to a non-government organization without public bidding.See Ref. 1.


I don not feel good about this. Something does not smell good. It is not a fishy smell however. And we cannot suggest an alternative course of action. Shall we just let His Exellency go unscath on this matter?

Did the successful impeachment of former Supreme Court justice Corona gone to the President's head?

Further reading.

  1. Philstar: Padaca not guilty of graft, says Noy

  2. wikipedia article on Grace Padaca

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Internal dissent may lead to Iranian leaders downfall


The harsh economic sanctions may have a telling effect on Iran after all, with the Iranian rial losing 40 % of its value recently, but we know that totalitarian states may live long. Consider North Korea.But unlike North Korea, Iran is a not an atheist state. Iran traded with the rest of the world unlike North Korea which was virtually hermetically sealed against outside forces.


Signs of panic buying are around in Iran, with some people buying rice for a WHOLE year! Iran depended so much on oil exports that it failed to strengthen its domestic economy.

This might force leaders to change their hardline stance regarding nuclear power development. On the other hand, it is a distant possibility that this will force the leaders to intstitute illogivcal draconian measures to the extent of impoverishing or bringing famime to the Iranian people.


We hope not, and Israel can breath a sigh of relief that Irans main enemy is itself and does not have to strike deep into Tehran to destroy nuclear reactors.
]

Further reading:

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Turkey retaliates against Syria shelling across borders!



Syrian government forces might be foolish to shell refugees across Turkey. Such acts can be a valid license for Turkey to shell back government forces fighting refugees who regularly cross the borders.

See Turkish artillery targets Syria

This is a worrisome development but if it hastens a change in government in Syria, with Bashar Assad stepping down, this might be more "acceptable" than having more thousands of dead Sytians and a few Turks.

We call on Bashar to affect a peaceful transition. Am sure that other countries would offer him exile, like the USSR and China. He has crossed the line and his options are shrinking. He needs to think of his future in Syrian history, as right now, he might find it difficult to remove the the man who destroyed Syria. Such dishonor will live longer when the younger Assad is long dead.

Now all three branches are acting stupidly on the cybercrime law!


I thought the Supreme Court will issue a TRO on the implementation of the Cybercrime law. Instead of rising to the occasion by doing its mandated function of determining the constitutionality of the recently passed law, the noble Supreme Court choose to delay deliberations on seven petitions questioning the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Cybercrime law.

Specifically, the SC refused to take a stand on the following sections:

  • Sec 4. which includes cyber defamation, cyber threats and Internet libel in the list of cybercrimes subject to prosecution by the Department of Justice.

  • Sec. 6. which hands down a higher degree of punishment for people found guilty of libel and allows them to be charged separately under the Revised Penal Code for the same offense.

  • Sec 19. which gives the secretary of justice the power to block or restrict access to any content upon prima facie finding of violation of the law even without trial.
The law was passed Sep 14. Thats too long a time for them justices to discuss the merits of the petitions to nullify parts of the Cybercrime Law. Score a -1 for the Concepcion-Morales Ma. Lourdes Sereno led Supreme Court.

Further reading:

Musings from a respected judge on Cybercrime Prevention Law

I am honored to present in this blog a cogent critical analysis of the Cybercrime Prevention Law from a respected friend who is in the legal profession.


Critics of the Cybercrime Prevention Law, mostly from the many users of the popular Internet Social Media Sites, like Facebook and Twitter, are up in arms against this most recent piece of legislation, passed by Philippine Congress.

The Cyber age has brought considerable changes in our way of life as we employ web based technologies in human communication, information dissemination and sharing, instant messaging, and social networking. This medium has opened up vast array of applications that could link communities, organizations, and individuals. Social media is now one of the most powerful source of news, information, opinion, and entertainment. What is amazing is the medium allows for user generated content. There is more unilateral freedom of expression.

The guarantees of free expression, is sacrosanct. The principle remains unchanged, with or without the Internet. The impact of the Social Media, in the protection of this freedom, as well as State restriction from abuse of this freedom, are likely to be debatable issues.

Hackers are now on the rampage cracking government websites as if taunting the government, and show them how vulnerable they could be.

There is no question that censorship in whatever form is repugnant to free speech and press. As the most complex vehicle, in this age, for the expression of ideas, or even of art or entertainment, the Social Media should not be excluded from the protection of this freedom.

I agree with the observation that this law might infringe on free speech, because it seems to impose prior restraint, and subsequent punishment. This is not the same as saying that there should be absolute and unbridled freedom in the internet, which could also be destructive and injurious. We need good law to balance these interests.


Published with permission from the true author who has to remain anonymous.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Campaigns against the cybercrime law heating up in Facebook?


Here is one campaign pooter from "We support Anonymous Philippines"


From Philippine Internet Freedom Alliance:

By approving this law, President Aquino's luster may dim:



A blackout call to protest the Cybercrime Prevention Law:






All copyrights remain with the original owners. Published in the public interest,

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Are our lawmakers, president stupid in respectively crafting and passing into law R.A. 10175 Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012?


Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution states that

No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression or of the press, or of the right of the people to peacably assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.

Yet our lawmakers are wasting our time and taxpayers money in crafting the Republic Act 10175 Cybercrime prevention Act of 2012. The bill was approved as law by Pres. Aquino, showing that his advisers are non wiser than the people of the legislative branch who crafted such law.

Yet we know from reputable sources, that the rider on libel was surreptitiously inserted by senator Sotto, he of plagiarism fame!

let us see if the Supreme Court is stupid also if it rule the Cybercrime law as constirutional . Thiw event will add more credence that the Philippines is run by fools in stateman clothing.

We would not resort to hacking government sites as we do not know how to and dont want to know. Nor shall we resort to physical harm on our esteemed lawmakers (and lawbreakers!) as such things can backfire on us. Love your enemies even if they dont love you back.

Further reading:

Friday, September 28, 2012

A dangerous generalization from the author of "A Law each day column"



I still read his column though I may agree with his views. I am writing this to stimulate discussion on a law which still has to see the light of day in this country, the reproductive health bill. In one of his recent columns A dangerous tendency, the author of that article made the following atrocious generalization of the reproductive health bill:



This MVP-ADMU parting of ways highlights once more the growing discord and confounding confusion brought about by this RH bill being imposed upon us by foreign lobbyists and governments out to enforce their agenda of population control through abortion by the use of contraceptives.



Aw shucks. There goes my ounce of respect through the window.








Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Obama's complete speech to the United Nations, Sep. 25, 2012




Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentleman: I would like to begin today by telling you about an American named Chris Stevens. Chris was born in a town called Grass Valley, California, the son of a lawyer and a musician. As a young man, Chris joined the Peace Corps, and taught English in Morocco. And he came to love and respect the people of North Africa and the Middle East. He would carry that commitment throughout his life. As a diplomat, he worked from Egypt to Syria, from Saudi Arabia to Libya.

He was known for walking the streets of the cities where he worked -- tasting the local food, meeting as many people as he could, speaking Arabic, listening with a broad smile. Chris went to Benghazi in the early days of the Libyan revolution, arriving on a cargo ship. As America’s representative, he helped the Libyan people as they coped with violent conflict, cared for the wounded, and crafted a vision for the future in which the rights of all Libyans would be respected. And after the revolution, he supported the birth of a new democracy, as Libyans held elections, and built new institutions, and began to move forward after decades of dictatorship. Chris Stevens loved his work. He took pride in the country he served, and he saw dignity in the people that he met.

And two weeks ago, he traveled to Benghazi to review plans to establish a new cultural center and modernize a hospital. That’s when America’s compound came under attack. Along with three of his colleagues, Chris was killed in the city that he helped to save. He was 52 years old. I tell you this story because Chris Stevens embodied the best of America. Like his fellow Foreign Service officers, he built bridges across oceans and cultures, and was deeply invested in the international cooperation that the United Nations represents. He acted with humility, but he also stood up for a set of principles -- a belief that individuals should be free to determine their own destiny, and live with liberty, dignity, justice, and opportunity.

The attacks on the civilians in Benghazi were attacks on America. We are grateful for the assistance we received from the Libyan government and from the Libyan people. There should be no doubt that we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and bringing them to justice. And I also appreciate that in recent days, the leaders of other countries in the region -- including Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen -- have taken steps to secure our diplomatic facilities, and called for calm. And so have religious authorities around the globe. But understand, the attacks of the last two weeks are not simply an assault on America.


They are also an assault on the very ideals upon which the United Nations was founded -- the notion that people can resolve their differences peacefully; that diplomacy can take the place of war; that in an interdependent world, all of us have a stake in working towards greater opportunity and security for our citizens. If we are serious about upholding these ideals, it will not be enough to put more guards in front of an embassy, or to put out statements of regret and wait for the outrage to pass. If we are serious about these ideals, we must speak honestly about the deeper causes of the crisis -- because we face a choice between the forces that would drive us apart and the hopes that we hold in common.

Today, we must reaffirm that our future will be determined by people like Chris Stevens -- and not by his killers. Today, we must declare that this violence and intolerance has no place among our United Nations. It has been less than two years since a vendor in Tunisia set himself on fire to protest the oppressive corruption in his country, and sparked what became known as the Arab Spring. And since then, the world has been captivated by the transformation that’s taken place, and the United States has supported the forces of change. We were inspired by the Tunisian protests that toppled a dictator, because we recognized our own beliefs in the aspiration of men and women who took to the streets.

We insisted on change in Egypt, because our support for democracy ultimately put us on the side of the people. We supported a transition of leadership in Yemen, because the interests of the people were no longer being served by a corrupt status quo. We intervened in Libya alongside a broad coalition, and with the mandate of the United Nations Security Council, because we had the ability to stop the slaughter of innocents, and because we believed that the aspirations of the people were more powerful than a tyrant. And as we meet here, we again declare that the regime of Bashar al-Assad must come to an end so that the suffering of the Syrian people can stop and a new dawn can begin. We have taken these positions because we believe that freedom and self-determination are not unique to one culture. These are not simply American values or Western values -- they are universal values. And even as there will be huge challenges to come with a transition to democracy, I am convinced that ultimately government of the people, by the people, and for the people is more likely to bring about the stability, prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace in our world. So let us remember that this is a season of progress.

For the first time in decades, Tunisians, Egyptians and Libyans voted for new leaders in elections that were credible, competitive, and fair. This democratic spirit has not been restricted to the Arab world. Over the past year, we’ve seen peaceful transitions of power in Malawi and Senegal, and a new President in Somalia. In Burma, a President has freed political prisoners and opened a closed society, a courageous dissident has been elected to parliament, and people look forward to further reform. Around the globe, people are making their voices heard, insisting on their innate dignity, and the right to determine their future.

And yet the turmoil of recent weeks reminds us that the path to democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot. Nelson Mandela once said: “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” True democracy demands that citizens cannot be thrown in jail because of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without paying a bribe. It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their minds and assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process that guarantees the rights of all people. In other words, true democracy -- real freedom -- is hard work.

Those in power have to resist the temptation to crack down on dissidents. In hard economic times, countries must be tempted -- may be tempted to rally the people around perceived enemies, at home and abroad, rather than focusing on the painstaking work of reform. Moreover, there will always be those that reject human progress -- dictators who cling to power, corrupt interests that depend on the status quo, and extremists who fan the flames of hate and division. From Northern Ireland to South Asia, from Africa to the Americas, from the Balkans to the Pacific Rim, we’ve witnessed convulsions that can accompany transitions to a new political order. At time, the conflicts arise along the fault lines of race or tribe. And often they arise from the difficulties of reconciling tradition and faith with the diversity and interdependence of the modern world. In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask themselves how much they’re willing to tolerate freedom for others.

That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity. It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well -- for as the city outside these walls makes clear, we are a country that has welcomed people of every race and every faith. We are home to Muslims who worship across our country. We not only respect the freedom of religion, we have laws that protect individuals from being harmed because of how they look or what they believe.

We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them. I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. And the answer is enshrined in our laws: Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. As President of our country and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day -- (laughter) -- and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly disagree with. We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but because our founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can quickly become a tool to silence critics and oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression; it is more speech -- the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect. Now, I know that not all countries in this body share this particular understanding of the protection of free speech. We recognize that.

But in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how do we respond? And on this we must agree: There is no speech that justifies mindless violence. There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There’s no video that justifies an attack on an embassy. There’s no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan. In this modern world with modern technologies, for us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who engages in such speech to create chaos around the world. We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond. More broadly, the events of the last two weeks also speak to the need for all of us to honestly address the tensions between the West and the Arab world that is moving towards democracy. Now, let me be clear: Just as we cannot solve every problem in the world, the United States has not and will not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic transitions abroad. We do not expect other nations to agree with us on every issue, nor do we assume that the violence of the past weeks or the hateful speech by some individuals represent the views of the overwhelming majority of Muslims, any more than the views of the people who produced this video represents those of Americans. However, I do believe that it is the obligation of all leaders in all countries to speak out forcefully against violence and extremism. It is time to marginalize those who -- even when not directly resorting to violence -- use hatred of America, or the West, or Israel, as the central organizing principle of politics. For that only gives cover, and sometimes makes an excuse, for those who do resort to violence. T

That brand of politics -- one that pits East against West, and South against North, Muslims against Christians and Hindu and Jews -- can’t deliver on the promise of freedom. To the youth, it offers only false hope. Burning an American flag does nothing to provide a child an education. Smashing apart a restaurant does not fill an empty stomach. Attacking an embassy won’t create a single job. That brand of politics only makes it harder to achieve what we must do together: educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise. Understand America will never retreat from the world. We will bring justice to those who harm our citizens and our friends, and we will stand with our allies. We are willing to partner with countries around the world to deepen ties of trade and investment, and science and technology, energy and development -- all efforts that can spark economic growth for all our people and stabilize democratic change. But such efforts depend on a spirit of mutual interest and mutual respect. No government or company, no school or NGO will be confident working in a country where its people are endangered. For partnerships to be effective our citizens must be secure and our efforts must be welcomed. A politics based only on anger -- one based on dividing the world between “us” and “them” -- not only sets back international cooperation, it ultimately undermines those who tolerate it. All of us have an interest in standing up to these forces.


Let us remember that Muslims have suffered the most at the hands of extremism. On the same day our civilians were killed in Benghazi, a Turkish police officer was murdered in Istanbul only days before his wedding; more than 10 Yemenis were killed in a car bomb in Sana’a; several Afghan children were mourned by their parents just days after they were killed by a suicide bomber in Kabul. The impulse towards intolerance and violence may initially be focused on the West, but over time it cannot be contained.

The same impulses toward extremism are used to justify war between Sunni and Shia, between tribes and clans. It leads not to strength and prosperity but to chaos. In less than two years, we have seen largely peaceful protests bring more change to Muslim-majority countries than a decade of violence. And extremists understand this. Because they have nothing to offer to improve the lives of people, violence is their only way to stay relevant. They don’t build; they only destroy. It is time to leave the call of violence and the politics of division behind. On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future, or the prisons of the past. And we cannot afford to get it wrong. We must seize this moment. And America stands ready to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future. The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt -- it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted, “Muslims, Christians, we are one.”

The future must not belong to those who bully women -- it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons. The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s resources -- it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support. The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims and Shiite pilgrims. It’s time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.”

Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, that’s the vision we will support. Among Israelis and Palestinians, the future must not belong to those who turn their backs on a prospect of peace. Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the right of Israel to exist.


The road is hard, but the destination is clear -- a secure, Jewish state of Israel and an independent, prosperous Palestine. Understanding that such a peace must come through a just agreement between the parties, America will walk alongside all who are prepared to make that journey. In Syria, the future must not belong to a dictator who massacres his people. If there is a cause that cries out for protest in the world today, peaceful protest, it is a regime that tortures children and shoots rockets at apartment buildings. And we must remain engaged to assure that what began with citizens demanding their rights does not end in a cycle of sectarian violence.

Together, we must stand with those Syrians who believe in a different vision -- a Syria that is united and inclusive, where children don’t need to fear their own government, and all Syrians have a say in how they are governed -- Sunnis and Alawites, Kurds and Christians. That’s what America stands for. That is the outcome that we will work for -- with sanctions and consequences for those who persecute, and assistance and support for those who work for this common good. Because we believe that the Syrians who embrace this vision will have the strength and the legitimacy to lead. In Iran, we see where the path of a violent and unaccountable ideology leads.

The Iranian people have a remarkable and ancient history, and many Iranians wish to enjoy peace and prosperity alongside their neighbors. But just as it restricts the rights of its own people, the Iranian government continues to prop up a dictator in Damascus and supports terrorist groups abroad. Time and again, it has failed to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is peaceful, and to meet its obligations to the United Nations.

So let me be clear. America wants to resolve this issue through diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do so. But that time is not unlimited. We respect the right of nations to access peaceful nuclear power, but one of the purposes of the United Nations is to see that we harness that power for peace. And make no mistake, a nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained. It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy. It risks triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the non-proliferation treaty.

That’s why a coalition of countries is holding the Iranian government accountable. And that’s why the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. We know from painful experience that the path to security and prosperity does not lie outside the boundaries of international law and respect for human rights. That’s why this institution was established from the rubble of conflict.


That is why liberty triumphed over tyranny in the Cold War. And that is the lesson of the last two decades as well. History shows that peace and progress come to those who make the right choices. Nations in every part of the world have traveled this difficult path. Europe, the bloodiest battlefield of the 20th century, is united, free and at peace. From Brazil to South Africa, from Turkey to South Korea, from India to Indonesia, people of different races, religions, and traditions have lifted millions out of poverty, while respecting the rights of their citizens and meeting their responsibilities as nations. And it is because of the progress that I’ve witnessed in my own lifetime, the progress that I’ve witnessed after nearly four years as President, that I remain ever hopeful about the world that we live in.

The war in Iraq is over. American troops have come home. We’ve begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014. Al Qaeda has been weakened, and Osama bin Laden is no more. Nations have come together to lock down nuclear materials, and America and Russia are reducing our arsenals.

We have seen hard choices made -- from Naypyidaw to Cairo to Abidjan -- to put more power in the hands of citizens. At a time of economic challenge, the world has come together to broaden prosperity. Through the G20, we have partnered with emerging countries to keep the world on the path of recovery. America has pursued a development agenda that fuels growth and breaks dependency, and worked with African leaders to help them feed their nations.

New partnerships have been forged to combat corruption and promote government that is open and transparent, and new commitments have been made through the Equal Futures Partnership to ensure that women and girls can fully participate in politics and pursue opportunity. And later today, I will discuss our efforts to combat the scourge of human trafficking. All these things give me hope. But what gives me the most hope is not the actions of us, not the actions of leaders -- it is the people that I’ve seen.

The American troops who have risked their lives and sacrificed their limbs for strangers half a world away; the students in Jakarta or Seoul who are eager to use their knowledge to benefit mankind; the faces in a square in Prague or a parliament in Ghana who see democracy giving voice to their aspirations; the young people in the favelas of Rio and the schools of Mumbai whose eyes shine with promise. These men, women, and children of every race and every faith remind me that for every angry mob that gets shown on television, there are billions around the world who share similar hopes and dreams.

They tell us that there is a common heartbeat to humanity. So much attention in our world turns to what divides us. That’s what we see on the news. That’s what consumes our political debates. But when you strip it all away, people everywhere long for the freedom to determine their destiny; the dignity that comes with work; the comfort that comes with faith; and the justice that exists when governments serve their people -- and not the other way around.

The United States of America will always stand up for these aspirations, for our own people and for people all across the world. That was our founding purpose. That is what our history shows. That is what Chris Stevens worked for throughout his life. And I promise you this: Long after the killers are brought to justice, Chris Stevens’s legacy will live on in the lives that he touched -- in the tens of thousands who marched against violence through the streets of Benghazi; in the Libyans who changed their Facebook photo to one of Chris; in the signs that read, simply, “Chris Stevens was a friend to all Libyans.” They should give us hope. They should remind us that so long as we work for it, justice will be done, that history is on our side, and that a rising tide of liberty will never be reversed. Thank you very much.


Source: whitehouse.gov

Did Obama say that?



In a speech addressed to the United Nations,


The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support


Only a few will read the full text of this first black American President. Yet his speech is in effect telling fanatics, who will not read Obama's full text around the world, that it is ALL RIGHT to kill American Ambassadors, tourists or visitors since they represent a few extremist among the American people who slander the founder of Islam! Of course, his speech, does not say the future DOES NOT belong to CHRISTIANS or JEWS. But offhand by the first line, he may be saying the future belong only to the MUSLIMS!

A stupid speech, if not read in full, but then he is President of the United States. I am now concerned about the repercussions.

Obama believes that people around the world are sane as Americans back home. Do you frankly believe that countries which approve or turn aside the following:

  • forced women circumcisions!!
  • honor killings
  • kidnappings and beheadings of victims
  • attack embassies and murdering foreign ambassadors?
  • putting to death those who converted to Christianity
  • making humans and children carry bombs to detonate them

will READ his COMPLETE speech on TOLERANCE?

This illustrates the danger of Power Point type of analysis. By extracting only the "relevant part" the import of the whole message is LOST!

I have reposted also the complete speech of Obama, in a new posting. Here is the source: whitehouse.gov

More reading:

Monday, September 17, 2012

Iran: Nothing will remain of Israel if it attacks.


The Washington Post has quoted the Commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard that his


country’s missiles will ensure “nothing will remain” of Israel if it takes military action against Tehran over its controversial nuclear program.


He added that

Iran might close the vita Straits of Hormuz if it is attacked, withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and hit U.S. bases in the Middle East!"


Such threats are nothing new, and it reflects the deep hatred of the theocractic leadership towards Israel.With that clear cut warning of annihilation, Iran is confirming its past stand that Israel has no right to EXIST!


We are a little apprehensive that we might also have a big problem in out hands as the Philippines has a significant number of citizen Muslims . Yet Iran is not held high with regards by the moderate Arab world and in fact other countries in the Persian are strengthening their defenses and improving their counter offensive capabilities towards Iran.


Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Is Obama weak towards Muslims? While Muslims are openly hating the USA, and just killed the US ambassador to Libya!


This is an unfortunate turn of events, which hopefully will jolt the occupant of the White House to action! The American Ambassador to Libya was just killed by a Muslim mob, enraged by a movie purporting to scandalize their Allah.

Is it not amazing that civilized Western Christian nations are tolerant towards Mulstims while Muslims openly hate and persecute Christians? For example, any muslim who convert to christianity is charged with apostasy and earn a usual death sentence for the conversion.

A mob has attacked the Benghazi compound of the US Embassy and has killed the US Ambassador and three other Americans!See Washington Post: US Ambassador killed.

Obama should now give a warning to the enemies of the USA that its patience has been tested severely. But will he do it? For example, he has done nothing forcefully towards Iran while restraining Israel. The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel may attack Iran by its lonesome, without the support of its ally to prevent the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons. He even suggested that the Obama administration does not possess the "moral right" to forestall military action by Israel towards Iran.

The Secretary of state, Hillary Cinton, has made a public announcement that the United States will not impose or set a deadline for Iran to drop its nuclear program!!! Naturally, the Israel prime minister correctly replied that absence of a red line, the Iranians will surely develop a nuclear bomb.

A troubling question: Is Obama a closet Muslim?



Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Getting mad over Obama on the nuclear plans of Iran



It will take a year for the United States to respond to Iran leaders to go ahead with developing nuclear weapons. This is from US secretary of defense Leon Panetta [Iran independent News Service,Israeli International News].

The unfortunate thing for the US is that Iran does not have to publicly declare it is developing nuclear weapons, it might have already done so quietly while Obama tries to exhaust all means by diplomacy to encourage Iranian leaders to drop its world order shattering plans! Every day that Obama delays sending a strong signal to Iran that the US does not want a nuclear powered Iran is a blessing to the intrasigent Iranian leaders! It buys time for them to go about its secretive way to be a nuclear powered nation in the league of Pakistan and India.

By not drawing a red line, and in spite of a United Nations report that Iran is progressing in its nuclear goals in terms of nuclear fuel enrichment, Obama risks and has already riled up Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel. Israel is being left alone to fend off for itself and may have to strike deep in Iran as it did in Iraq. But the theocratic Iranians have dug in, putting their nuclear processing plants very deep into the bowels of the earth, making them difficult to be damaged by ordinary ordnance bombs. It may require a MOAB ground busting type bombs and/or nuclear weapons to destroy these installations.

Netanyahu has said dangerously:


"The world tells Israel to wait because there is still time," he said. "And I ask: Wait for what? Until when? Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel."



The current state of Iran nuclear work is reported in [United Nations receives new intelligence on Iran Nuke work], its damming conclusion: Iran has made significant gains in building a nuclear weapon, and in fact has performed computer modeling on calculating the destructive power of an atomic warhead within the past three years.


Obama will go down in history as the president of the United States, who facilitated Iran to become a regional nuclear power. Once Iran attains its goals, the Middle East will be a powder keg drawing in the start of Armageddon.

The dangers of a unilateral attack by Israel on Iran nuclear sites is such that the head of UK M16 intelligence has made a personal visit to the prime minister [M16 boss met Netanyahu]

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Senator Sotto caught lying about the birth-control pill Diane-35?!


In a dramatic priveleged Senate speech, Sen. Tito Sotto mentioned that he and his wife lost a child due to a birth-control pill Diane. The Senator said that his wife Diane started taking Diane in 1974. Yet the pill was only made available in 1978.

The good Senator was caught lying! His story of losing a baby now tugs at our incredulity of disbelief.

Conclusion: The Senator is delaying voting on the RH Bill. He should be reprimanded for lying under oath! Much better, he should resign and go back to showbiz.


Visit the link,

Leloy Claudio challenges Sen. Sotto to a debate

The birth control pill Diane-35 is manufactured by Bayer Schering Pharma in Germany. Here is an article showing its side effects, published in 2011: Joseph Pritchard: http://www.livestrong.com/article/108291-side-effects-diane-birth-control/. The pill costs 1.19USD for a 21-pill pack. See Swiss pharmacy: Diane-35

Friday, August 24, 2012

At last, we have a new Supreme Court Chief Justice: Ma. Lourdes P.A. Sereno



President Ninoy Aquino, in spite of his critics disdain has appointed Ma.Lourdes Punzalan Aranal-Sereno as the next Chief Justice to replace the previous Chief Justice Corona who has the dubious honor of being the first one to be impeached for false declaration in his SALN! We will be watching if Sereno will be a rubber stamp of the president or be an upright independent , moral and ethical chief justice. Congratulations are in order to both Sereno and the president on this hopeful development.!

We welcome CJ Sereno and give her a one week grace period of one week, seven days starting tomorrow, with absolutely NO negative comments in our blog. So help us. August 24.

Here is her info at a glance obtained from the supreme court writeup on her. We would like to fill in the dates for veracity of her record, but we cannot find other sources aside from our references!

  • Date of Birth - July 2, 1960
  • earned a BS Economics degree at the Ateneo de Manila University
  • 1984: BAchelor of Laws (now called a JD, juris doctor), graduating with valecdictorian honors.
  • Master of Laws, Michigan Law School.
  • legal counselor of the WTO Appellate Body Secretariat in Geneva.
  • chosen as chair of the steering committee of the Preparatory Commission on the Constitutional Reform.
  • taught at UP College of Las for 19 years.
  • August 2010, appointed to the Court as associate justice by Pres. Aquino
  • August 24, 2012: Appointed as the as the 24th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.", replacing then acting chief justice Antonio Carpio.

References:
  1. http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jsereno.php
  2. Wikipedia

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Diplomacy is what Iran needs to continue developing their nuclear capability


we are alarmed by Iran's continuing nuclear development program. The latest (unconfirmed) news is that it has deployed more than a hundred centrifuges to purify uranium to 20%, deeply in a covered Fordow mountain. The output purity is dangerously close for creating atomic nuclear weapons.

The myopic view of Obama and his defense, intelligence advisers, not to confront Iran directly, will redound to the USA with serious consequencies. Iran thrives on sowing false hopes and discord between the Jewish state and its backer nation of the USA.
The window of opportunity to strike fear into the heart of intrasigent non-Arab Iran, an avosed anti-Semitic state may have been closed, and may call for disparate measures from the small state of Israel.

Expect worse developments in the muddled Middle East, where the state of Israel may have to commit to a most dangerous action to preserve itself. Iran may have to be nuclear bombed to bring senses to its leaderss who may or may not be survivors of a holocauset caused by its stupidity.

It is unbelievable that Pres. Obama of the US is playing deaf and dumb on the so called "Peaceful" nuclear program of Iran. Perhaps a Sum of All Fears situation may not be even enough to jolt the USA to action, it has already whittled away any surprise on retaliatory measures against Iran.

We dont believe Iran needs a nuclear program, it is awash in oil. But let it continue its ways and suffer the consequencies too. This call for continued diplomacy will only strengthen Iran's hand and provides a false cover of peaceful piety.


Further reading:

Jerusalem Post: Sources- Iran expands nuclear capacity underground

Sunday, August 19, 2012

The country may have lost a good man from government service.


I do not know personally the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) Secretary Jess Robredo but I was shocked at the news yesterday Saturday that his plane he was riding to Naga City from Cebu City crashed in the water just short of the airport of Masbate. He was supposed to take a commercial flight to Manila and make a connecting flight to Naga. The impact of the water landing threw out his aide who survived with a broken arm. Two pilots and Sec. Robredo were reportedly strapped to the doomed plane.

Sec. Robredo epitomizes a breed of young politicians who are really dedicated to serve their constituency. He has served six mayoral terms in Naga City, his first was when he was only 29 years old!

I believe no one can survive a chilly more than 24 hours exposure to water without air, but we still hope that he has survived somehow like the miraculous escape of his aide. Already parts of the Piper Seneca turboprop plane were retrieved (a part of the right wing).

The latest update is that surface search will continue while diving and aerial rescue operations will be resumed on Monday [See the reference below]. Dead or alive, we want his body found and bring finality to this horrible incident on a Saturday afternoon.

Further reading:

Friday, August 17, 2012

Senator Sotto is a god who is not subject to copyright laws and is always free to plagiarize!


Sotto immune from plagiarism raps, top aide says!


What kind of leaders run the Philippines? Well senators are above copyright laws, says an aide to Senator Sotto who was caught plagiarizing parts of a blog article.

It is not a crime to plagiarize portions from a blog article in crafting Senator Sotto's Anti reproductive-health bill speech in the Senate, asserts Atty. Hector Villacorta. The aide also feels that Senator Sotto does not have to apologize to blogger Sarah Pope of thehealthyeconomist.com, the author of the article from which Sotto copied portions, for offending the blogger's sensibilities.


Villacorta, in proclaiming his genius about copyrights, claimed that the (Internet) WWW is public domain, and that governments are exempted form copyright rules, while Sotto himself enjoys parliamentary immunity as a legislator.

Villacorta again is showing his extreme genius, about Copyrights and Public Domain:
We quote here from the
http://onecoolsitebloggingtips.com/2011/09/15/copyright-and-public-domain/
reference:


Copyrightable works include but are not limited to literary works such as articles, blog posts, stories, journals, or computer programs, pictures and graphics, as well as audio and video recordings. Copyrights do not need not be applied for as they are vested in the creators of intellectual property. When we create something — we own the copyright, which is our exclusive right as the creator to control who else can use our work and in what manner.



Villacorta claims the blogsite [theehealthyhomeeconomist] is public domain and Senator Sotto is free to plagiarize said portions of the article. Since Sotto is a member of government, it is not a crime for him to palagiarize! Understand??

Was the blogger commercially injured? She was not! No law was violate since there is no crime!

Government and Senator Sotto in particular is exempted from the copyright rule.
Bloggers, beware what you put out on the web. You should not cry if used by the web," the genius Atty. Villacorta claimed.


We are agrieved that we have genius lawyers like Atty. Villacorta. For one, works in the public domain are those for which copyright has expired! From what I read, blog contents are copyrightable, and the copyright extends while the author is alive and 70 years after his/her death! More, the Berne copyright convention says that as a blog article is automatically copyrighted as soon as an author publishes in the web, with the copyright owned or held by the blog author.


Atty. Villacorta should be debarred if he continues to show his genius to the World!
This only shows that our Senators are generally unethical creatures.

We expect the good Senator Sotto to publicly apologize not only to the blogger(s), but also to the Filipino nation for his stupid transgression, and if he is man enough, to think about leaving or resigning his office.

As for Atty. Villacorta, he should know that the Philippine is a signee of the Berne copyright convention, on August 1, 1951!

Filipinos deserve leaders who they voted for, and senators deserve aides who they employ. Straighten up people! Apologize! Is that too little to ask of you?



References

Thursday, August 16, 2012

What the healthyhomeeconomist blogger say about Sen. Sotto copying parts of her article without attribution.


She was not pleased about Senator Sotto lifting part of her article about how the pill can harm you future child's health.

She said, and I quote liberally due to its public importance in the Philippines:



Nice try, Senator. You had me almost convinced you were a nice guy with the tears and all.Many of your citizenry have emailed me assuring me that was a put on, and I am starting to think that they are right.

A thief is a thief, Mr. Senator.Denying it does not get you off the hook,it just makes you a lying thief.





Further reading:

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

No respect for law enforcers? MMDA enforcer life is no fun.


I need the full story before I make a commentary on the following attack on an MMDA(Metro Manila Development Authority) traffic enforcer.



More info on the guy attacking the enforcer Caviteno Filipino blog



The enforcer name is in the comments section of the youtube blog.

Assaulting an officer may be a major offense in the USA. We can see that the enforcer did NOT carry a gun in the embedded video.

Remarks: I was shocked when the original blogger link led to an insecure site, now corrected. This is just a reminder that current events are mined for commercial and attack purposes.

Monday, August 6, 2012

The Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches (PCEC) speaks out on the RH Bill.





The Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches, a network of more than 30,000 evangelical congregations in the Philippines, reiterates its call for the immediate consolidation and passing of the House Bill 4244, more commonly known as the Reproductive Health Bill. We call on our legislators to end the debates and to vote for its approval. We wholeheartedly support Pres. Aquino’s statement that “Perhaps the debates should end and Congress can decide, once and for all, on the responsible parenthood bill,”

We believe that the RH Bill is pro-life. Life begins at fertilization, and the promotion of the use of artificial forms of contraception does not take away life, for life begins at the union of the sperm and the egg cells.

We believe the RH Bill promotes a responsible lifestyle. As we have stated in our previous statements, God had created man in His own image (Genesis 1:26-27). When He commanded Adam and Eve to “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it,” He gave it to a world population of two. Now that the world population has escalated to seven billion, all the more, we are to fulfill the second part of the mandate, which is to subdue the earth. Responsible parenthood should be one of our responses to this call, and this would entail determining the number of children that we would raise in decent standards.

We believe that the purpose of marriage is not procreation alone, but also to enjoy the divinely instituted intimacy between husband and wife.

We believe abortion is a sin and should not in any way be tolerated. We support the RH Bill because it recognizes such reality, and does not promote nor legalize abortion.

We believe that the RH Bill fulfils the responsibilities of the Government in its duties to promote good and restrain evil. The Bill is one of the ways in which the government aids in the development of our countrymen by helping them actualize their duties in the family. People have the right to be educated and it is unconscionable to keep the people in ignorance.

We restate: the RH Bill is pro-life, pro-development and pro-poor.

For the Board of Directors:
Bishop Efraim Tendero,
National Director
Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches

August 5, 2012


Sunday, August 5, 2012

The Pope has SPOKEN: Using condoms can be morally justified!




We hope that the legislative houses of Congress and Senate gather together now and vote for the passage, of the Reproductive Health Bill or RH Bill.

We are happy that Father Niebres has spoken his stand on RH bill, and now no less than the Pope has now spoken: Using condoms can be morally justified!.

For more information, pleas visit Telegraph.com: Pope drops Catholic ban on condoms.


This hopefully will help in the slowdown and even stoppage of the spread of AIDS, a curse going through AFRICA, and will help mothers and fathers in the practice of responsible parenthood, by giving each child the best environment and support to grow!


Photo courtesy of The Telegraph.com, published under Fair Use.


Will replace the above image with free version very soon!

This photo is in wikicommons.





RH Bill: A canard exposed : Contraception is Corruption!



Come now Bishop Villegas who said the Contraception is Corruption. Nothing is further than the truth!

Here is a graph from Oscar Picazo, published in his Facebook wall:



The graph shows the contraceptive prevalence rate and corruption perception.
I tend to agree with the interpretation of the graph, although how the acceptance or availability of inexpensive (or even free) contraceptives can lead to less corruption is still a mystery. Perhaps other factors come into play.

The very fact that the Philippines already has a low corruption perception is in itself interesting. It shows the perversion of Catholic upbringing or tradition!

Incredible that the Roman Catholic Church is raising its voice of opposition to the RH Bill, which does not ocndone abortion at all. I mean were they that vociferous in Italy, France and Ireland? These foreign perdominantly Catholic countries even have divorce laws!

One thing we can be alarmed over the opposition of the church to the RH Bill, Their stand can lead to unnecessary polarization and divisions. As the constitution respects the separation of Church and state, the Catholic church may soon find itself the focus of criticisms. For instance, the Church accepted money from the Philippine Charity Sweeptakes to buy SUVs for their superiors.

Graphic published with permission from the copyright ownder Oscar Picazo.







Saturday, August 4, 2012

World, Syria: Does Assad understand history?


The spanish philosopher George Santayana once said : Those who refuse to learn history are doomed to repeat it!

Has Syria’s Bashar Al Assad forgotten what happened to Muammar Khadaffy of Libya last October 20, 2011 ? How the Libyan leader was surrounded by his enemies, shot at and his body paraded for all to see? How his body was stored in a freezer for some days (Muslims bury their dead in 24 hours) in some abandoned food store?

Assad, with the backing of Russia and China, two nations which humstrung the United Nations actions and plans to end the violence in Syria, continues to give pain, sorrow and death to his own countrymen! His generals and ambassadors are desserting him and his regime. Even Kofi Amman has given up on diplomacy to end the bloodletting.

But read the news on Aleppo, Hama and Damascus. Assad;s formidable armed forces are using tanks, planes, and mortars on the rebels, whose ranks continue to swell as the days and months wore on. We give Assad, despite his training as a doctor of medicine, high marks for bloodthirsty and heavy handed responses in the cities of Aleppo and in Damascus, where executions are done almost every day!

yrian leader Assad's planes pound vital prize of Aleppo

Dozens reported killed in Damascus as Syria rebels try to halt advance on Aleppo

Assad has closed the door to a decent exit in Syrian history. Instead, if the rebels ever capture Damascus, we are sure to witness again the lessons of history on tyrants and dictators, with Assad, his family, and his tribe, possbily experiencing a gruesome retaliation.

Assad should go now! to the safety of his benefactors and supporters, to Russia or China. and let Syria rebuild without him. Thats is what wrong with dictators. They have a warped sense of their importance in thier country’s history.

We hope this will be over by October, the month when Khdaffy of Libya died, resisting the roaring call for change.


Further reading:

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Chick-fil-A, when sounding out your Christian principles labels you an IMMORAL.


The news are full of criticisms of the president of Chick-fil-A , Dan Cathy, who stated that his company believes in the biblical definition of the family unit. Basically, Mr. Dan Cathy believes that traditional marriage is between a man and a woman, not between a man and man or between a woman and a woman. Yet, the media grabbed another "event" considered news worthy, any "anti-gay" movement should be suppressed. Even the mayor of Boston chimed in that his city will not allow a branch of chick-fil-A to be set up in that location.

What does the Lord say about homosexuality?

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God." (NIV).

Consider the next verse:

1 Corinthians 6:11 - "And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God." (NIV)

Again, if homosexuality is a sin, it behooves upon those who believed in the Christ as their savior to STOP SINNING. Just a mere profession that they accepted Christ as savior will not do! They should change their behavior.


And let us not forget the passages focusing on Sodm and Gommorah!Cities which were destroyed due to their transgressions!

Unfortunate that the great country of USA is now sliding towards blind immorality, blind in the sense, that they still consider themselves MORAL.

It is now fantastic that we may live to see the day when nations consider good as evil and evil as good. The world is upside down!


References:

chicago leaders roasts Rham Emmanuel over Chick-a-fil stance

to understand better why Chick-fil-A supports Christian values,
click on Wikipedia .


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Fact or fiction? Were Iranian reactors compromised again by a sophisticated worm/virus?


I was amused when I read this item from gawker.

The new worm is not shy in making its presence felt. In fact it is loud! It plays "Thunderstruck" by AC/DC at full volume at any time of the day. How effective is it?
It is said that an Iranian nuclear scientist wrote a Finnish computer security export that their nuclear program has been compromised and that it has shutdown down their automation network at Natanz and another nuclear research facility Fordo near Qom.

It sounds crazy and we hope it is just that or the cyber warfare may escalate into a real war between Iran and it avowed enemy state of Israel. We are curious how a virus which play back loud rock music can immobilize a sophisticated nuclear reactors. Something deeper is happening and we are out of the loop, we cannot know what the virus is really doing.

Hope this attack will make both Iranians and Israelis rock together for PEACE!